• Users Online: 8069
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 71-72

Revisiting the underemphasized advantages of apprenticeship in light of competency-based medical education

Department of Anatomy, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India

Date of Web Publication19-Jun-2019

Correspondence Address:
V Dinesh Kumar
Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_13_19

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Kumar V D. Revisiting the underemphasized advantages of apprenticeship in light of competency-based medical education. J Curr Res Sci Med 2019;5:71-2

How to cite this URL:
Kumar V D. Revisiting the underemphasized advantages of apprenticeship in light of competency-based medical education. J Curr Res Sci Med [serial online] 2019 [cited 2022 Aug 16];5:71-2. Available from: https://www.jcrsmed.org/text.asp?2019/5/1/71/260631

Dear Sir,

Clinical teaching, in most of the Indian Medical Colleges, has been working on the principles of the Halstedian master-apprenticeship model,[1] which is more of an opportunity-based learning approach. For example, a student posted in surgery may get opportunities to witness and assist a variety of cases ranging from simple excision of cyst to complex surgeries based on chance. In the apprenticeship model, student initially becomes familiar with common medical problems, legitimately participates in a peripheral manner, performs under supervision, and finally perform independently.[2] The main drawback of this model is that it is difficult to ascertain whether students have gained satisfactory level of surgical acumen at the end of postings and moreover, mere observation might not help them in reaching the desired level of expertise. Particularly, in countries like India, where significant variations exist in the number and types of cases during clinical posting, the efficacy of master-apprenticeship model differs based on the case load and faculty:student ratio. However, we could not deny the fact that the immersive experience provided by this model has motivated a significant proportion of students to choose the specialty as future career.[3]

In order to achieve equitable and satisfactory level of competency among medical graduates, the concept of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) was proposed. The deficiency in the apprenticeship model, i.e., the uncertainty whether all graduates are capable of performing specific tasks could be addressed by means of EPAs.[4] The critiques of competency-based medical education often lament about the fact that the rigid checklist-oriented training would break the immersive experience of learning into small junks at the cost of authenticity. At this context, we are left with two questions as follows: (1) Are we keen on focusing on proximal needs and compromise on flexibility needed for facing a more uncertain professional future? and (2) Are we going to miss out a few domain independent competencies which are specific for particular disciplines?

For answering thefirst question, we need to reiterate certain positives which are conferred by the master-apprenticeship model in clinical workplace learning. The flexibility, in terms of pursuing individual interests and goals, could be afforded to students by aiding them using the principles of communities of practice. By following this, students can be grouped for apprenticeship or stewardship programs in different departments and can be given chances to explore beyond the stipulated competencies. Von Bodegom et al.[5] stated that students' clinical acumen gets remodeled in master-apprentice relationship when they enter the “hidden curriculum” of the workplace. Based on this, they put forth that the apprenticeship model, if executed rigorously, would serve as a potential method for teaching the skills of critical thinking, listening, questioning, and framing arguments. In other words, these are few attributes which might get lost when clinical teaching is subjected to the reductionist process.

Workplace learning, during apprenticeship, cannot be stereotyped as mere learning and reproduction of skills. In addition, the learner acquires “tacit knowledge” through informal interaction with peers and masters.[6] These “tacit” components of medical education constitute the domain independent competencies which are usually learned through interaction between two or more individuals or groups.[7] Considering the fact that, in the healthcare profession, the responsibility of putting the learned things together while providing patient care is the sole responsibility of the learner, we could enunciate the value of skills being learnt in social settings.

To conclude, the pendulum of education swings between reductionism, where the continuum of learning an individual specialty is broken down into nested units and holism, in which the students are subjected to immersive clinical experience. The former offers the benefit of facilitating every medical graduate to achieve satisfactory level of competencies, whereas the success of later one depends on the reflection and self-regulation of the student. Amalgamating the benefits of both school of thoughts might yield significant benefits to the learner. Therefore, we plea the educators to introspect on the underemphasized advantages of apprenticeship model such as clerkship postings and retain them. In addition, newer modalities such as communities of practice should be implemented for facilitating the individual interests of students.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

Cameron JL. William Stewart Halsted. Our surgical heritage. Ann Surg 1997;225:445-58.  Back to cited text no. 1
Sheehan D, Bagg W, de Beer W, Child S, Hazell W, Rudland J, et al. The good apprentice in medical education. N Z Med J 2010;123:89-96.  Back to cited text no. 2
Hodges B. Assessment in the post-psychometric era: Learning to love the subjective and collective. Med Teach 2013;35:564-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
Ten Cate O, Scheele F. Competency-based postgraduate training: Can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Acad Med 2007;82:542-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
Van Bodegom D, Hafkamp M, Westendorp RG. Using the master-apprentice relationship when teaching medical students academic skills: The young excellence class. Med Sci Educ 2013;23:80-3.  Back to cited text no. 5
Gowlland G. Apprenticeship as a model for learning in and through professional practice. In: Billett S, Harteis C, Gruber H. editors. International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning, Springer International Handbooks of Education. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014.  Back to cited text no. 6
Kuper A, Reeves S, Albert M, Hodges BD. Assessment: Do we need to broaden our methodological horizons? Med Educ 2007;41:1121-3.  Back to cited text no. 7


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded211    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal