• Users Online: 170
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 116-118

Bilateral absence of third and fourth lumbricals: A case report with clinico-evolutionary insight


1 Department of Anatomy, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, India
2 Department of Anatomy, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India

Date of Submission16-May-2018
Date of Acceptance21-Jul-2018
Date of Web Publication13-Dec-2018

Correspondence Address:
N A Priyadharshini
Department of Anatomy, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_16_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Lumbricals are wormlike, intrinsic muscle of the hand. During routine dissection of a male cadaver of age approximately ranging between 50 and 55 years, the absence of third and fourth lumbricals on both the palm was observed. First and second lumbricals showed no anatomical variation. Other muscles of hypothenar eminence supplied by deep branch of ulnar nerve which also supplies the third and fourth lumbricals were normal. Lumbricals are principle extensors of interphalangeal joint, and its role in flexion of metacarpophalangeal joint is meager. Variability in the presence of medial two lumbricals has evolutionary correlation and also shows its minimal role in the extension of interphalangeal joint of its respective digits. Henceforth, knowledge of absence of lumbricals is crucial for surgeons while planning for hand surgery.

Keywords: Flexor digitorum profundus, hand surgery, lumbricals, variations


How to cite this article:
Priyadharshini N A, Kumar V D, Rajprasath R. Bilateral absence of third and fourth lumbricals: A case report with clinico-evolutionary insight. J Curr Res Sci Med 2018;4:116-8

How to cite this URL:
Priyadharshini N A, Kumar V D, Rajprasath R. Bilateral absence of third and fourth lumbricals: A case report with clinico-evolutionary insight. J Curr Res Sci Med [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Mar 19];4:116-8. Available from: http://www.jcrsmed.org/text.asp?2018/4/2/116/247486




  Introduction Top


The lumbricals of the hand are named after the Latin word “Lumbricus” meaning of earthworm, beacuse of their appearance. These muscles are unique, as their origins and insertions are on tendons without bony attachments. Disproportionate to their size and shape, they are important for humans in performing precision pinch. They connect two extrinsic antagonistic muscles, extending between flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and extensor hood at the level of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint. The first and second lumbricals are innervated by the median nerve which also supplies the thenar muscles of the hand. This feature along with the arrangement of lumbricals in the radial side of flexor tendons helps in achieving effective coordination during three-digit precision pinch movements.[1] Third and fourth lumbricals, being innervated by the ulnar nerve, are bipennate in nature. Zone 3 transmetacarpal amputations have poorer outcomes if lumbricals are damaged or their blood supply is disrupted.[2] This might be due to the imbalance of the viscoelastic forces about the extensor mechanism, causing intrinsic contracture. Hereby, we document a case of bilateral absence of third and fourth lumbricals with relevant clinical and the phylogenetic significance.


  Case Report Top


During routine dissection classes for the 1st-year medical students, in a male cadaver of age approximately 50–55 years, bilateral absence of third and fourth lumbrical was noticed [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. There was no remnant of fibers of the muscle to substantiate for mechanical injury or surgical removal of the muscle. No variations were observed in the course of deep branch of ulnar nerve which usually supplies the third and fourth lumbricals. Muscles of hypothenar eminence supplied by deep branch of ulnar nerve were normal. Normally, lumbricals take origin from FDP tendon in the palm. First and second lumbricals, which are unipennate, originate from the FDP tendon and inserted into distal twig of dorsal digital expansion, innervated by median nerve were observed. The feature was similar on both the hands. No other neurovascular variation was seen.
Figure 1: Dissection of left palm with dotted arrows showing first and second lumbricals and thick arrows pointing absence of third and fourth lumbricals; FDP: Flexor digitorum profundus tendon

Click here to view
Figure 2: Dissection of right palm showing first and second lumbricals in dotted arrows and thick arrows pointing absence of third and fourth lumbricals; FDP: Flexor digitorum profundus tendon

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Lumbricals are quite unique as they serve as a mechanical link for the articular system of the digits that produces dynamic-controlled extension of the interphalangeal joints. Lumbrical is certainly not a strong muscle as it has smallest physiological cross-sectional area. The long fiber length (40–48 mm) of the lumbricals is responsible for the large excursions possible by them.[3] Even though the direct contribution of the lumbricals for the MCP joint flexion is debatable, its indirect contribution to interphalangeal joint extension is substantial.[4] They also play a vital role in conveying the proprioceptive feedback regarding the interphalangeal joints by acting as “tensiometers” between flexors and extensors.[5] This can be explained from the evolutionary perspective, whereby the increase in number of muscle spindles and decrease in the size of muscle has been observed from nonprimates to humans, to aid in performing repetitive alternating movements.[6] The contribution of lumbricals in precise pinch movements and functional grasp could possibly explain variation in the morphology and nerve supply between the lateral two and medial two muscles. On contraction, the first two lumbricals, which are mostly unipennate, bring the digits toward the radial side of the hand, helping to achieve the precise pinch movements. These two along with the thenar muscles are supplied by median nerve in common.[1] In contrast, the third and fourth lumbricals are mostly bipennate and are supplied by the ulnar nerve in common with the hypothenar and interossei muscles. The main function of these is to assist the much stronger synergistic interosseous muscles in extending the interphalangeal joints.

In the present case, we had a rare anomaly of bilateral absence of third and fourth lumbricals. Variant morphology of lumbricals is mostly reported in terms of its supernumerary bellies, variation in attachments, or its nature (unipennate/bipennate). Third lumbrical has been labeled as the “most variable” one,[7] owing to the fact that misplaced/split insertions are common in it along with additional origins in few cases. Koizumi et al.[8] stated that fourth lumbrical was the most frequently absent among the lumbricals. In one cadaver, unilateral absence of second, third, and fourth lumbricals have been documented.[9] Of 30 cadavers examined in a study,[10] third lumbrical was found to be absent in one case (3.3%). Another study[11] reported absent fourth lumbrical in four out of 68 hands.

Lumbricals contain entirely type II myosin heavy chain and minimal type I myosin. The aging-associated loss in the fiber number that is observed in larger skeletal muscles was not present in the lumbrical muscles, owing to the greater number of motor neurons.[12] It can be inferred that the absence of lumbricals witnessed in the present case is not due to denervation injuries or occupational-associated atrophy. As the lumbrical passes volar to the interpalmar plate ligament and the interosseous muscle passes dorsal to it, absence of the lumbricals might limit the proximal movement of the related joints and cause intermetacarpal pain while making a fist. We did not have any clinical history to corroborate the above-said findings. From biomechanical perspective, the absence of two lumbricals, which is mostly congenital, would have resulted in minor changes in range of motion of the involved joints. It can be presumed that interosseous muscle could have compensated the role of lumbrical in extension of interphalangeal joints. The congenital etiology for the absence of lumbricals and the relation between loss of the intrinsic muscle strength owing to the absence of lumbricals and activities of daily life still need further study. Nevertheless, the knowledge regarding these variations might be helpful during radiological interpretations and hand surgeries such as muscle-release procedures.


  Conclusion Top


We conclude that the knowledge regarding the bilateral absence of third and fourth lumbricals, which is quite uncommon, is very important for the clinicians and surgeons while designing hand surgeries. It would be interesting to elucidate the cause behind and quantify how much it can affect the mobility of the phalanges connected with specific activities.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Wang K, McGlinn EP, Chung KC. A biomechanical and evolutionary perspective on the function of the lumbrical muscle. J Hand Surg Am 2014;39:149-55.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Scheker LR, Chesher SP, Netscher DT, Julliard KN, O'Neill WL. Functional results of dynamic splinting after transmetacarpal, wrist, and distal forearm replantation. J Hand Surg Br 1995;20:584-90.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Jacobson MD, Raab R, Fazeli BM, Abrams RA, Botte MJ, Lieber RL, et al. Architectural design of the human intrinsic hand muscles. J Hand Surg Am 1992;17:804-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Ranney D, Wells R. Lumbrical muscle function as revealed by a new and physiological approach. Anat Rec 1988;222:110-4.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Leijnse JN. Why the lumbrical muscle should not be bigger – A force model of the lumbrical in the unloaded human finger. J Biomech 1997;30:1107-14.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Winckler G, Foroglou C. Comparative study on the neuromuscular spindles of the lumbrical muscles in certain mammals and in man. Arch Anat Histol Embryol 1965;48:1-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Mehta HJ, Gardner WU. A study of lumbrical muscles in the human hand. Am J Anat 1961;109:227-38.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Koizumi M, Kawai K, Honma S, Kodama K. Anomalous lumbrical muscles arising from the deep surface of flexor digitorum superficialis muscles in man. Ann Anat 2002;184:387-92.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Baa J, Prusti JS, Rath S. Unilateral absence of second, third and fourth lumbricals: A rare case report with an evolutionary significance. Int J Anat Res 2015;3:1237-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Hosapatna M, Bangera H, Kumar N, Sumalatha S, Nitya. Morphological variations in lumbricals of hand – A cadaveric study. Int J 2013;2013:821692.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ajmani ML. Morphological variations of lumbrical muscles in the human hand with some observations on its nerve supply. Med J Iran Hosp 2001;3:20-5.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Russell KA, Ng R, Faulkner JA, Claflin DR, Mendias CL. Mouse forepaw lumbrical muscles are resistant to age-related declines in force production. Exp Gerontol 2015;65:42-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed230    
    Printed18    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded31    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]